Review: Purchase i12 tws wireless earbuds

The i12 tws along with also the Inpods 12 are a very economical (max. $10) option to the well-known white earplugs from a fruity American brand. And wow, they are sometimes so excellent. It's possible, as you simply need to possess the right one. Meanwhile, lesser ears can also be called'i12'. They try to hitch a ride on success. But that doesn't make it any simpler for us earplug enthusiasts. No worries: we looked it up for you and allow you to know in this article which i12 or Inpods 12 you ought to have.

WHICH I12 TWS EXIST?

You've got the standard i12 tws earbuds and you've got the InPods 12. The i12 are always white. The Inpods are black or have a shade. There is 1 great variant of both variations with exceptionally good audio for under 10 euros. Additionally, there are many versions that are not as good. We place a great deal of work into finding the best (and probably original) version. However, it worked!

Our evaluation

We previously showed in our imitation Airpods buying manual that the i-numbers that the earplugs have in practice state small. Often times, it is factories and earplug vendors that have picked up that a specific i-number is getting popular and they give their earplugs the same name. So for us it always requires a good deal of work (and examine purchases) to determine which earplugs would be the best.

We analyzed a total of 17 different i12 and Inpods 12! This way you get the best information about which earplugs you can purchase. Are you pleased with that? Sign up for our alarms and emails about new evaluations. You will soon receive our pop-up inquiring if we could keep you informed. Doing this will keep you connected with us on our new tests and buying tips.

The i12 tws are earplugs that cost around 10 euros. We therefore also assess the earplugs at that cost. And let's get right to the point: We don't understand the way the manufacturer earns money with those earplugs.

Audio

The audio is too great for the purchase price. Of course you can hear that the marginally lower tones do not come through great. It seems as in the event that you hear the chipset do its task to keep up the connection with your cell phone. Obviously you would rather not hear this. However, the tones while listening to audio are really great for your 10 euros you pay. Only the inpods are a bit better (as well as cheaper) in our view.

Connect

Linking is simple. Alright, when you switch it on you will hear a Chinese girl say:'attached'. That has a inexpensive personality. We did not have an i12 tws version that may do this.

Siren lighting in the earbuds

The moment that you take the earplugs out of this box, the earplugs try to connect. You can immediately see this by the red and blue lights that go on. Subsequently, a blue and a red light in the earbud turns on.

Dial

There is a mic in the earbuds. This means that you can make calls with the i12 in your ear. Only we prepare you: do not expect a lot from it. People today know you, however, not obviously. Even if there is a small breeze, you can no more be noticed. The mic is actually a part of earplugs at which the large end earplugs distinguish themselves from the inexpensive tws. We tested them because we wanted to exclude this maybe not, for example, just white has great audio.

The InPods 12 tws are comparable to the normal i12, just they come in several different colors and they are matte instead of glossy. Much is exactly the same as with the i12. Just in this case the cost is slightly sharper.

Matte Rather than gloss

The material is made of matte plastic. That feels really good. It actually feels a little more superior than the i12's glow. Only they seem similar to the Airpods on account of the plastic. But is that so bad? We don't think so. As far as we are concerned, it's an advantage which the earplugs are matte. Also with the black version (because the Inpods come in all colors) it looks super boring and nice.

For many buyers it is important that the dimensions of this earbuds is the same as the Airpods. Sometimes you notice that earplugs have exactly the identical shape, but are unexpectedly a great deal larger. But we can guarantee you: how big the Inpods 12 is the same as the size of this Airpods: 4.1cm.

Touch management

With the cheaper earplugs you frequently understand that the touch does not respond completely correctly. Only in this case the touch control works tremendously well. There are some items that the Chinese manufacturers could have used a little smarter.

Harness after: pause / play

Tap three occasions

Abandoned: second song

Two things stick out from the programming of their touch management.

We tried all, but tapping was pointless. Until today, we have not figured it out yet. You do? Let us know! Then we'll finish this article.

Second: you are able to change on the previous and the previous song by tapping on 3 occasions. Just once you do that on the right earbud will you go to the previous track. And that is not intuitive. As far as we are concerned, left should be preceding and right ought to be next. Anyway, it is not a large issue.

Audio

Our expectation with all the Inpods i12 was that the noise (like the price) was marginally less. But we were totally surprised! The InPods i12 really sound slightly better. The hefty tones come out a bit better. And that for approximately $ 7. Moreover, the earplugs are marginally better in terms of stability.

It was striking that the quantity only begun to harm the ears when we put it to 75 percent. With many different earplugs that's already at 40%. The quantity in the earbuds is therefore set quite lightly. This (in conjunction with the colors) make them very suitable for kids.

Connect and disconnect

Connecting is simple. Alright, when you turn it on you will hear a Chinese woman say:'attached'. That has a cheap character. In addition, disconnecting at the ears is also not that easy.

Together with the pricier earplugs (such as the i500 tws), the earplugs disconnect immediately when shutting the charging box. We didn't get an i12 tws version that may do this. Anyway: that is why you pay less than 10 euros for your earplugs.

CONCLUSION

Locating the Inpods 12 is cheaper and better than the i12. We therefore advise buying the Inpods. But be mindful, we purchased about 10 collections of Inpods from various sellers on Aliexpress. Certainly 1 of those versions was that the original Inpods. And they were much better compared to the others.

The i12 will also be fine, but we favor the Inpods 12 since they sense warmer and nicer, have improved audio and are slightly cheaper. It is also possible to choose a color. We're lovers of this Inpods!

DisclaimerWe have analyzed these earbuds from the context of the price you pay for your earbuds. Obviously with earplugs of $100 or $30 you get a much more professional audio with bass. However, for the price of those Inpods, we're really surprised by the quality.

The USB is a nice type: history and perspectives of an immortal format

The new MacBook Pro has ensured goodbye to USB type A, a connector on Macs for almost twenty years and that has made the story of Apple, and more. A painful, but inevitable transition.

The Universal Serial Bus (known by all as USB) is an interface that older MAC users have learned to know at the time of the first IMac, the first model of Apple's second life, which enshrined the return home of Steve Jobs and who has (re) launched Apple In the world of casual computing and (then) different.

But in spite of rumors that today shout to the scandal for the lack of presence of the connector more using in the history of computer science in the new models, at first things did not go Toppo well: in 1998 computers, especially Macs, were mostly a Office accessory or graphic studio, hard to find them in the living room or bedroom, having to stop the PCs, cheaper and suitable for an industry with which Apple never (really) tied up, the games.

The USB input in the Mac World (in version 1.1) coincided with the farewell of the SCSI connector, a little soft passage that, if in the Windows world was well received (where SCSI never really arrived) in that Mac was like a trauma.

Elephant memory

USB had the huge advantage of being able to be plugged in "hot", which meant a computer turned on, was smaller and could be used for both external memory units (disks and keys) and for peripherals (mice, keyboards, pads and more on IPod, IPhone and headphones), But it had the huge drawback of being very slow (12 Mbps rated against the 40 of the Ultra Wide SCSI).

Not missed so much that Apple joined to usb the FireWire, more expensive but more capable of USB for disks and memory drives, which already beat 10 to 1 SCSI.

But the history and fame of USB, despite the early moans, grew fast aided especially by the diffusion in Windows, where FireWire is never (really) arrived. In 2000 came the USB 2.0 format, backward compatible with USB 1 and 1.1 and capable of a nominal transfer rate of 480 Mbps, more or less when Apple passed to the FireWire 800 format (which dubbed the first FireWire in all, including speed , but had a different connector).

Apple took a while to adopt the new USB 2.0 format that came three years later than the Windows world, a very mature market.

The USB 2.0 format was a revelation: they blossomed hubs of all kinds, practically any accessory was equipped with a USB port and also the series of IPod, initially based on FireWire, passed to USB mainly because of compatibility with the Windows world, then A key turning point in the market.

Mice, keyboards, headphones, speakers, graphic tablets, MP3 players, ipods, iphones, ipads, clocks, mechanical discs, flash drives and keys or even only bulbs, fans and accessories for intimate use are now sold with a USB connector. Whether you are exchanging data with the computer or drawing only to the power of the channel to date a USB connector is much more universal, for example, an electrical outlet (which is subject to the change of characteristics and form of country in the country).

USB, a nice type

But despite the diffusiore of oil, in memory of those who write far greater than any other hardware standard in the world of computing, the history of USB is not without shadows, misunderstandings and controversial aspects.

The duality with SCSI and FireWire, albeit in specific areas was short-lived, but it is undeniable that the story will bring it back. Much more controversial was the history of the connectors, of which USB is well stuffed.

The type a connector, what we all know, rectangular with a footprint in the center, is the typical USB connector that stops (VA) computer side.

It is estimated that it was a technical limit of the time to determine its asymmetric shape, which still makes it difficult to insert it into a computer (especially in an iMac), but it was not the only one. Also the choice to create a second USB connector type B, of square shape, which typically rests on the device side, turned out in uncomfortable time.

Minor aspects, or not

Not to mention the little precision of the cables: a USB 1.1 and 2.0 cable are different internally (but they use the same connectors) and can frustrate some advantages of the second, I have never been regulated a standard wording to alert the Users, who Tipicametne once opened the box had no way of distinguishing the difference between them if not trying it on the field.

To make things difficult have arrived other connectors, always USB 2.0, probably asked by the big computer manufacturers and devices to minimize the spaces. Mini USB was the first attempt to replace the type B connector with a smaller one, which has spread a lot in cameras, 2.5 "discs, camcorders

To make things difficult have arrived other connectors, always USB 2.0, probably asked by the big computer manufacturers and devices to minimize the spaces. Mini USB was the first attempt to replace the Type B connector with a smaller one, which has spread much in cameras, 2.5 "discs, camcorders and accessories such as graphics tablets, while in the printers sector the old Type B connector still resists.

This has succeeded the Micro USB, which today dominates the market thanks to the diffusion in the smartphone sector (where it has become a standard) first and accessories for smartphones then (as speakers and battery pack). Apple never believed in the Micro USB preferring to impose its variant first in 6Pin version and then Lightning, the first serial connector to be symmetrical.

But if on the one hand the type B has ceded the step to the Mini USB first and Micro USB then (with Variant Lightning), the type a connector has remained unchangeable until today, switching to a version 3.0 unchanged aesthetically (except for the internal dimensions often of blue color) Capable of bringing a speed ten times higher than USB 2.0, but being backward compatible with it and often even with the old standard 1.1. On the other side the type B has split offering a normal variant and a Micro, aesthetically unwatchable, always asymmetrical but very functional and economical.

This is to say that you, the USB is a standard, you can connect practically anything, from the mouse to the Hard Disk, from the Bluetooth speaker to charge the battery to the portable fan. But it's not a standard that easy, to think about it: four versions (1.0, 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0, the first ever arrived on Mac), eight connectors, three cables and all intertwined with each other in spite of users, who are often left to themselves and a drawer full or cables to which it is difficult to give an order.

Apple, first, had the courage and daring to impose a change, as it was at the time for the Floppy, for the CD/DVD and for other abandoned hardware formats.

The new advancing

The USB 3.1 connector (also called type-C) is a very important change, and the new MacBook Pro today offers a model historically equal to the first iMac in many places of view.

The first novelty is the unique connector, on both sides: this means that a cable can do everything, connect to everything, without differences (for now, we will see in the future).

The second novelty is that cable and connector are symmetrical: We could connect the cable to the connector without worrying about the verse, and the same on the part of the device, being the two identical parts. In practice, type C is the definitive connector: Considering that the current standard is also common with Thunderbolt 3, with differences in performance but not of shape and design, we expect a more rosy future, less anger and a more tidy cable tray.

Finally, also from the software point of view things are certainly better: a USB 3.1 connector can drive a data connection with an external disk, a network connection, drive an external display in 4k (or Anaogico in VGA) and also provide an additional socket for the Old USB 3.0.

Sure, it will take more than a few years before the market is adjust to the new standard, that the investments of producers and users are based on the new format instead of the old ones, we will probably spend a lot in adapters (here a brief overview) that in aspirin When we forget them at home, but who writes has already passed this stage so many times, and is still here.

The USB 3.1, or USB-C HUB as the friends call it, is here to stay, it says Apple, they will say it all sooner or later.

Two weeks with the new Apple MacBook, the end of the end

TEST-The new ultra-portable computer from Apple has been available for a few days. Europe 1 tested it for two weeks. Verdict.

Test

Getting an opinion on a computer is not always obvious. And for the sake of it, even more so than the smartphone, the opinion that is made depends on the use that one has. Some are looking for a computer to write e-mails and type long documents while others want to be able to make video editing and photo retouching. Some also want a computer to take anywhere with them when those who move little will prefer a large screen model, even if it is less manageable.

So to give us an opinion on the new Apple MacBook (with an Intel Core M3 processor and 256 memory), the ultra-portable of the Apple Computer range, we decided to use it for two weeks as the main computer. So we used it in the office, on the move or in the transports and this as well to enter text as to edit images. Fifteen days later, checkup.

A very nice machine, to take everywhere

Facing the new MacBook, our regular MacBook Pro is very heavy and thick. And because of this, the new Apple machine weighs less than a kilo (920 grams). And despite its 12-inch screen, a little wider than that of the usual 11-inch models, it's hard to make more portable. The MacBook is without problems everywhere with you. Both in the office, in the airplane or in the train, it is easy to open and work with this machine that accommodates little space.

The design reminds us of what we already know about Apple. The computer is beautifully built, looks sturdy despite its finesse and gives a high end impression. Like its eldest, the MacBook Pro, it is available in silver grey and in sidereal grey. Like on the IPhone, you can also find pink gold and gold.

A striking comfort

Among the evolutions of this cuvée 2017 compared to the previous model, the Apple brand changed the keyboard. The latter now takes over the same butterfly technology as the MacBook Pro released last fall (which we had tested here). The result is similar: the striking, although confusing at first, is particularly comfortable. When it is necessary to enter long texts, like this text that we write with the MacBook, we appreciate the weak press of the keys, more pleasant than on a classical keyboard.

Especially, despite the small size of the machine, the keyboard is well organized and each key falls easily under the fingers. In two weeks, we seldom have to make typos or be embarrassed by the positioning of certain keys.

A minimalist connection

On the connection side, the MacBook is the least minimalist. It is available in all and for both connectors: a type-C USB port used to recharge the device or connect accessories and a mini jack for connecting headphones or headphones. And with only one port, USB-C which is more, some will not find their account. An adapter is indeed indispensable for plugging in a USB stick, an external monitor or even to recharge its smartphone (except to have the necessary cable).

So, is it awkward on a daily basis? Yes, and No. In our case, we use quite a few external devices and we didn't need a single adapter in fifteen days. Those who juggle between USB sticks and external screens on the other hand will need to acquire an adapter (between 25 and 79 euros, depending on the type of adapter). But in general, those who regularly need to connect multiple devices at the same time will prefer a MacBook Pro, with four USB-C HUb sockets.

Perfect for office automation and low-greedy stains

For two weeks, we tried to vary the use of our test MacBook to the maximum to test its limits. So if it is perfectly suited to capture text, send and reply to emails, surf the Internet or view photos, it is clearly not suitable for some more greedy tasks. If the photo retouching does not pose a problem, it is better to avoid video editing. The Intel Core M3 processor is indeed quickly exceeded when the film exceeds a few minutes.


The built-in storage, 256 by default, also adapts well to these uses. If it will be a little bit just to store video editing or many movies, it is ample enough to contain a lot of documents or photos. For those who would still like a little more memory and power, another model, sold 1,799 euros, integrates an Intel Core i5 processor as well as memory 512.
The perfect machine in mobility

Autonomy, it, makes it the perfect machine in mobility. The MacBook makes it possible to hold a full day away from a power outlet. A real comfort. After two weeks of taking the MacBook everywhere with us, we finally have a lot of trouble getting back to our usual MacBook Pro with us as its weight seems important in a bag.

USB Type C vs USB 3.1: The point about differences and features

The debut of the new MacBook has created some confusion on the USB front, the availability of the only port Type C has made a stir but, being a new standard, not everyone has understood the real difference compared to the past. Let's make it clear that USB Type C is not a proprietary system such as MagSafe or lightning used in the past, it is part of the standards approved by USB-if and falls into the family of USB 3.1.

To prove it was Google a few days later with the launch of the new Chromebook pixel with dual USB port Type C available. The advantage of this small connector are the different possibilities of use merged in a single cable, physically different from the others and able to provide:

Electric charging

USB 3.1 Gen 1 (up to 5 Gbps)

Native DisplayPort 1.2 Video output

VGA output using the USB-C VGA multiport Adapter

HDMI video output using the USB-C digital AV multiport Adapter

The USB Type C connector is reversible but physically incompatible with existing USB, to work with the standard 3.1 will then serve an adapter. As Apple has shown, the Type C is a handyman port that can support several tasks at the same time.

The USB Gen 1 is nothing but the first update after USB 3.0, which leads to a peak transfer rate of 5 Gbps and a considerable leap from the 480mbps of the USB 2.0. It will follow the USB 3.1 Gen 2 with transfer rates of up to 10 Gbps.